OK.......So what were we talking about?

bob

Community Manager Part Time Dinosaur
Staff member
I know it was important, wasn't it?
 
LOL I don't remember....after my weekend I am not moving too quickly LOL. I think I need another cruise soon!
 
New Orleans in December--I always need a curise Niecie
 
For some reason I have BBQ'd Nutria recipes stuck in my mind........
or maybe it was Nutria on a Ritz cracker

It's all so confusing
 
Ooooh - I just now finally looked up Nutria...I'm not normally a picky person when it comes to food...but I ain't eatin' none of that!! :doubledown:

:biggrin:
 
Tastes like chicken, so they say............
 
I have a pesky ground hog that seems to want to live under my deck again. If I can ever catch that critter I'd be glad to send it your way Bob if you want to BBQ something interesting.
 
In the local dialect it would be "them what are"

as apposed to them....................

but using them would be adjective in the past tense and therefore
created a conjunctive proposition that would be a direct conflict of the
sentence if use in the foretense, thus the only proper use was "they"

I hope this clears this up for you.....
 
In the local dialect it would be "them what are"

as apposed to them....................

but using them would be adjective in the past tense and therefore
created a conjunctive proposition that would be a direct conflict of the
sentence if use in the foretense, thus the only proper use was "they"

I hope this clears this up for you.....

I know who writes your Lines.
 
Maureen, I'm sure Bob would very much enjoy having BBQ Groundhog as an evening appetizer, on Ritz Crackers. He does seem to crave the unusual.

Corky, I didn't know what Nutria was either.
 
Them what are .. vrs them remind me of intellectual variances which are interesting at best.
A great deal of social interaction has a primary link to the slangs and interpretations of what we like to refer to as the English language. All things in keeping, it is interesting to note that differences one may detect are by no means applicable to the general rule, but more so the social interaction of a group. In consideration of this I would suggest yet another extension of “Them their are” as another possibility.
 
I knew you would understand...........
 
In the local dialect it would be "them what are"

as apposed to them....................

but using them would be adjective in the past tense and therefore
created a conjunctive proposition that would be a direct conflict of the
sentence if use in the foretense, thus the only proper use was "they"

I hope this clears this up for you.....

Them what are .. vrs them remind me of intellectual variances which are interesting at best.
A great deal of social interaction has a primary link to the slangs and interpretations of what we like to refer to as the English language. All things in keeping, it is interesting to note that differences one may detect are by no means applicable to the general rule, but more so the social interaction of a group. In consideration of this I would suggest yet another extension of “Them their are” as another possibility.

I knew you would understand...........

crazy.gif
Youse guys crack me up :biggrin:
laughing.gif
smilielol.gif
 
It really says something, when they are the only ones who understand what they are talking about.

Do you understand this jibber jabber? I don't understand what they are saying, but you might understand what others don't understand. I wonder if they understand what the other is claiming to understand?
 
Back
Top