In the local dialect it would be "them what are"
as apposed to them....................
but using them would be adjective in the past tense and therefore
created a conjunctive proposition that would be a direct conflict of the
sentence if use in the foretense, thus the only proper use was "they"
I hope this clears this up for you.....
In the local dialect it would be "them what are"
as apposed to them....................
but using them would be adjective in the past tense and therefore
created a conjunctive proposition that would be a direct conflict of the
sentence if use in the foretense, thus the only proper use was "they"
I hope this clears this up for you.....
Them what are .. vrs them remind me of intellectual variances which are interesting at best.
A great deal of social interaction has a primary link to the slangs and interpretations of what we like to refer to as the English language. All things in keeping, it is interesting to note that differences one may detect are by no means applicable to the general rule, but more so the social interaction of a group. In consideration of this I would suggest yet another extension of “Them their are” as another possibility.
I knew you would understand...........